Companies that Comply with GDPR Reap Benefits in Jurisdictions Beyond the EU
Written by Achieved Compliance
Companies faced with meeting the requirements of the GDPR face a complex task. For businesses with limited grounding in data protection, understanding the law, mapping data, conducting risk assessment and mitigation, developing policies and protocols to govern data privacy and producing necessary documentation represents a significant investment of time and resources. Even for companies with data governance programs in place, reviewing those programs to ensure they comply with GDPR and making necessary adjustments is a significant undertaking.
But it’s important to recognize that the steps a company takes toward GDPR compliance will yield benefits in jurisdictions well beyond the European Union. Since its adoption in 2016, the GDPR has served as a model for governments around the world as they have established their own data protection regimes.
Laws in countries across Asia, South America, and Africa reflect the essential elements of the GDPR, which include honoring individuals' rights in their data, training employees about privacy responsibilities, conducting data protection impact assessments to understand processing risks, and being ready to demonstrate decisions made about data processing to regulators. Likely, any legislation enacted in the United States will also encompass these key obligations.
Companies in compliance with the GDPR will have already done the foundational work necessary to comply in these countries and regions. While some variation in the laws globally is inevitable, the basis for compliance will already be established.
This work benefits companies in three ways:
First, companies that establish an internal privacy program as articulated in the GDPR positions them to meet the obligations of emerging laws around the world — and therefore prepares them to enter new markets.
Second, companies that establish GDPR compliance position themselves as sought-after vendors. Increasingly, companies engaging third parties to store and process data include in their contract provisions requiring that vendors are able to meet the obligations to protect and secure data. Businesses prepared to immediately enter into such agreements – without needing time to meet requirements – will enjoy a competitive advantage over those that are not.
Finally, potential business partners also seek these assurances. Companies understand that sharing data with business partners can expose them to legal risk and potential compromise to brand and reputation. GDPR-compliant companies will be recognized as having taken steps that establish them as trusted partners that are knowledgeable about data and will protect it appropriately.
The GDPR’s influence on data protection law leverages a company’s efforts to comply. The steps a business takes to meet the obligations of the GDPR will ease its compliance burden in other countries and regions, and distinguish it as one prepared for opportunities in the global market.
Take the first step towards readiness. Contact us today to guide you through the journey to seamless data compliance.
PRIVACY BLOG
New Fine Highlights the Necessity of EU-GDPR Article 27 Representation for US Companies
The Data Use and Access Act 2025 (DUAA) Key Changes to Data Protection Law
Privacy Compliance: Why Software Solutions Could Put You at Risk
The Troubling Cuts to Medical Research
ARE YOU CREATING PRIVACY ISSUES WITH AI?
European Commission Publishes New Standard Contractual Clauses and Guidance on Implementation
New York State Attorney General’s Office Issues Guidance on Tracking Technologies and Privacy
Connecticut Attorney General’s Office Releases Report on New Data Privacy Law
Data Protection Commissioner of Ireland (DPC) Investigation Focuses on Location Data \nThe DPC recently wrote to inform data controllers who may be in receipt of or sharing location data that it has initiated the regulatory assessment. It also notified organizations linked to those whose activities are the subject of the DPC assessment and stressed that failure to meet statutory obligations pertaining to processing of location data will result in regulatory action.